A fair and just outcome.
These were the words used by both defence attorneys and prosecutors to describe the verdict in the Vindra Naipaul-Coolman murder trial, which ended yesterday with eight men being acquitted and two others being ordered to be retried.
Speaking with reporters immediately after the verdict, lead prosecutor Israel Khan, SC, said: “The ordinary God-fearing people that sat on this jury had a reasonable doubt in the case and they acquitted. You cannot tell people if you have a reasonable doubt acquit and when they do you are angry about it.”
Khan also defended the State’s prosecution of the accused men.
“The prosecution never wins or loses. We present the case to the best of our ability and leave it for the jurors to decide,” Khan said.
He also said the case should serve as an example for those who have suggested the abolishment of jury trials to improve the criminal justice system.
“Trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice, it ensures that freedom lives. This is where the ordinary God-fearing people get an opportunity to participate in the criminal justice system,” he said.
His sentiments were supported by defence attorney Ian Brooks, who praised the efforts of the jury.
“Strength of character by a jury is alive. The jury deliberated long and hard and came to a just and right conclusion,” Brooks said.
“I think T&T should feel proud of the persons who commit themselves to jury service and the quality of persons who give verdicts,” Brooks added.
Several other defence attorneys joined with Khan and Brooks to praise the use of juries in trials.
Mario Merritt, who represented three of the accused men and led the defence team, said: “This verdict is a tribute to our jury system. Our jury system is alive and well and for those who want it removed, they need to think again.”